E3: Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc.
 
Return to: E3 Home
 

Electricity Deregulation

Electricity deregulation typically separates a formerly integrated electric utility into unregulated generation companies, a regulated transmission company, and one or more regulated local distribution companies (LDCs).  The post-reform experience to date indicates that deregulation has failed to deliver reliable service at reasonable and stable rates.  E3 has been an active and major participant in the deregulation debate, with its professionals providing advice on:

  • Will electricity deregulation deliver safe and reliable services at reasonable and stable rates?
  • Relative to the regulatory status quo of integrated utilities, what are the benefits and costs of deregulation?
  • Are there less risky alternatives to deregulation that can improve the performance of the electric sector?
  • If deregulation must occur, how large is the stranded cost? And what should be the method of collection?



E3 at Work

  • Dr. Orans’s testimony before the British Columbia Utilities Commission led to the rejection of electricity market restructuring in British Columbia.

  • Dr. Woo’s advice delayed electricity deregulation in Israel.

  • Testimonies by Dr. Orans and Mr. Horii led the Texas PUC to reject the regulatory staff’s low estimates of stranded costs.


Selected Publications

  • Woo, C.K., I. Horowitz and A. Tishler (2006) "A Critical Assessment of the Hong Kong Government's Proposed Post-2008 Regulatory Regime for Local Electricity Utilities," Energy Policy, 34, 1451-1456.
  • Woo, C.K., A. Olson, I. Horowitz and S. Luk (2006) “Bi-directional Causality in California’s Electricity and Natural-Gas Markets,” Energy Policy, 34:15, 2060-2070.
  • Woo, C.K., M. King, A. Tishler and L.C.H. Chow (2006) "Costs of Electricity Deregulation," Energy, 31:6-7, 747-768.
  • Tishler, A. and C.K. Woo (2006) "Likely Failure of Electricity Deregulation: Explanation with Application to Israel," Energy, 31:6-7, 845-856.
  • Tishler, A., J. Newman, I. Spekterman and C.K. Woo (2006) “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Reforming Israel’s Electricity Industry,” Energy Policy, 34:16, 2442-2454.
  • Woo, C.K., M. King, A. Tishler, and L.C.H. Chow (2004) "Costs of Electricity Deregulation"
  • Woo, C.K., D. Lloyd, R. Karimov and A. Tishler (2003) “Stranded Cost Recovery in Electricity Market Reforms in the US,” Energy - The International Journal, 28:1, 1-14.
  • Woo, C.K., D. Lloyd and A. Tishler (2003) “Electricity Market Reform Failures: UK, Norway, Alberta and California,” Energy Policy, 31:11, 1103-1115.
  • Tishler, A., C.K. Woo and D. Lloyd (2002) “Reforming Israel’s Electric Sector,” Energy Policy, 30:4, 347-353.
  • Woo, C.K. (2001) “What Went Wrong in California’s Electricity Market?” Energy - The International Journal, 26:8, 747-758.
  • Orans, R., C.K. Woo and B. Horii (1995) Impact of Market Structure and Pricing Options on Customers' Bills, E3 report submitted to B.C. Hydro.


Price Benchmarking

Deregulation

Litigation Support

Integrated Resource Planning

Avoided Costs

Transmission & Distribution Planning

RFP Advisory Services

General Rate Cases

Distributed Generation

Renewable Resources

 
 Copyright © 2004. E3: Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc.